22MOON.COM
You can see the whole Earth from the Moon!

.

.

.

Glenn Beck:

Global warming,

Global

Government?

___October 19th, 2009

GLENNBECK.COM

___Part ONE of TWO

GLENN:

From high above Times Square

in Midtown Manhattan,

third most listened to show

in all of America.

Hello,

you sick twisted freak.

Welcome to the program.

We go to Christopher Monkton,

otherwise known as

Lord Monckton.

I mean,

call him Christopher or

do I have to call him Lord?

I can’t remember what we

decided last time we spoke.

Lord Monckton.

LORD MONCKTON:

It’s very simple.

GLENN:

How are you, sir?

LORD MONCKTON:

I am fine.

Are you on one knee and

wearing white gloves and

touching your forearm?

GLENN:

Of course I am,

my lege.

LORD MONCKTON:

In that case you may carry on.

GLENN:

So you are quite the hot topic

on Twitter and on the Internet.

If we could just find a way to

control the Internet oh,

I remember.

Net neutrality.

We’ll get to that Thursday.

Anyway,

you are quite the topic because

of this new global climate treaty

that is coming in December.

LORD MONCKTON:

Yes.

GLENN:

Tell me about it.

LORD MONCKTON:

This is the conference of the

state’s parties to the United

Nations framework convention

on climate change, which is a

hell of a mouthful,

I know.

But this has been in the

planning for two years,

ever since the same conference

met in Barley.

They always meet

somewhere nice.

This time it’s going

to be Copenhagen.

And at Barley it was planned.

As soon as they had got

George Bush out of the way,

they would push through a

climate treaty which would

involve the vast transfer of

wealth from the west to

poorer countries,

in the name of what is called

reparations for climate debt.

Now,

the extraordinary thing

about the draft treaty which

I have now seen is that it goes

far further than anything that

was planned at any

previous session.

What they’re now going to do

is to set up a world government,

and the word “Government”

actually appears in the treaty.

But you heard it here first.

The word

“Election, democracy,

vote, or ballot” does not appear

anywhere in the 200 pages

of the treaty.

GLENN:

All right,

you are talking hold

on just a second.

You are talking about

Paragraph 36 and 38 from

what I understand.

LORD MONCKTON:

That’s absolutely right.

The word “Government”

appears in there.

GLENN:

Do you have it

in front of you?

LORD MONCKTON:

I don’t have it in front of me

but I can remember it quite well.

GLENN:

All right.

Of course you can.

LORD MONCKTON:

And what it says is this:

There will be a new vast

interlocking bureaucratic entity

created at huge expense to you

and me and that bureaucratic

entity will have three purposes,

the first of which is twice stated

to be government.

The second purpose is stated to

be the transfer or redistribution

of wealth from countries like

ours to third world countries

in reparation for what is

described in the treaty as

climate debt.

In other words,

we’ve been burning CO2 in

huge quantities.

They say that’s altering the climate.

Actually we now know it isn’t,

but they say it is.

And therefore they

say we have to pay,

get this,

anything up to 2% of GDP

every year to poorer countries.

Now,

the third element in the task

of this new government will be

what is called enforcement.

In other words,

the power of the new government

to make Democratic countries

hand over their cash, whether

they like it or not.

But more than that,

there will be an interlocking

series of so called technical panels

which will have the right directly

to intervene in the economies

and in the environment of

individual countries over the

heads of their elected

governments.

So what we are talking about

is a fledgling world government

and because it’s not elected,

it’s essentially a

communist world government.

GLENN:

May I where are you now?

LORD MONCKTON:

I am at the moment in Texas.

I’m speaking at Texas A&M tonight.

But I will be in D.C. or New York

for the whole of the next week

because I’m trying to make sure

that your congress does not

allow any of this to happen.

GLENN:

All right.

You don’t stick out

at all in Texas,

do you?

LORD MONCKTON:

No,

I fit in just fine.

I’m tall,

I wear snakeskin cowboy boots.

GLENN:

Right.

LORD MONCKTON:

And,

of course,

my Texan accent is famous.

GLENN:

Yes.

You can just say,

howdy, y’all.

Go ahead.

LORD MONCKTON:

Howdy, y’all.

GLENN:

See?

You fit right in.

All right.

So what I’d like to

do is I’d like to,

I’d like to spend an hour

with you,

quite honestly,

Lord Monckton,

and have you on the TV show

and maybe bring in ambassador

John Bolton about this as well.

LORD MONCKTON:

He would be a wonderful man.

It would be an honor to take

part with you and him in

such a program.

GLENN:

Now,

does he I mean,

does I mean,

have you ever met before?

LORD MONCKTON:

I have met him briefly,

but it would be really good

to have a proper chance to

talk to him on this.

GLENN:

All right.

LORD MONCKTON:

Because he would certainly,

with his vast experience,

be able to put this in context

far better than I could.

GLENN:

Well,

now here’s what now,

this is the global climate treaty

that we are expected to sign,

right?

LORD MONCKTON:

That’s right.

GLENN:

And this is something that the

president has made a priority,

et cetera, et cetera.

LORD MONCKTON:

That’s right.

The danger is that now

that he’s been given his

Nobel Peace Prize,

if he goes to Copenhagen

with Al Gore at one elbow

and Jim Hansen at the other

in front of the teeming zombies

in their tens of thousands,

he will sign anything.

And he won’t read the small print.

Nobody seems to have read the

small print until I picked it up.

It’s quite extraordinary that

this has got as far as it has with

nobody noticing that what

they’re going to do is what

Maurice Strong who originally,

he’s a Canadian bureaucrat

who originally set up the

structure of the UN’s

intergovernmental panel on

climate change 20 odd years ago,

he has always wanted this to

transmogrify into a world

government and he is now g

oing to get his way far faster

than any of us had realized

unless we can stop him.

And we only have

weeks to stop this.

GLENN:

Well,

I do know that if you look

at the transnationalism and

the transnationalists,

you know,

that the New York Times has denied,

you know, that Barack Obama

is surrounding himself with.

LORD MONCKTON:

Yeah.

GLENN:

You know,

this is the direction they’re going.

Now,

here’s the concern.

LORD MONCKTON:

Yeah.

GLENN:

The concern is that President

Obama would sign this and then

it would be ratified by Congress.

LORD MONCKTON:

Well,

now I’ll tell you what

has to happen.

Under your Constitution,

I think it’s Article VI,

there has to be a 2/3 majority

of the Senate in order to ratify it.

Now,

I don’t think that he’ll get

a 2/3 majority in the Senate.

I’m reasonably sure there are

enough senators including blue

dog senators who will realize

that if they hand over your

democracy and your Constitution

and make it subject to this new

treaty because that’s how your

Constitution works,

Article VI taken with the Vienna

convention on the interpretation

of international treaties means

that an international treaty

prevails over your Constitution.

And so if he signs away

your Constitution,

he is signing away for the first

time your democracy to an

alien bureaucratic entity that

you don’t elect.

That’s the danger.

Now, if he can’t get it

through the Senate,

during his election campaign

he and his staff began saying

that they didn’t like that part

of the Constitution but meant

they had to get 2/3 of the

Senate to agree.

And the way that he is

proposing to do it and this was

announced during his campaign

is to get a simple majority

in both houses,

which he can of course get

because he has a reasonable

majority in both houses so that

the treaty will be enacted into

your domestic law.

Now,

that is slightly less drastic

than if the Senate were to

ratify it because at least in

theory you can repeal a domestic

law, whereas you can’t resolve

from a treaty and once you sign

a treaty,

the only way you can get out

of that officially is by getting all

the other states parties to

let you go.

And since you’ll be the country

that’s big most in the way

of reparations,

there’s no way they will let you

go once they’ve got you into it.

GLENN:

Right.

And here’s also

the other problem

LORD MONCKTON:

Yeah.

GLENN:

that we have.

When you can’t get the

Senate to ratify it,

what they do is they get the

states to join in and the cities

to join in and then have it

contested in court.

And what they do is then

the Supreme Court looks for

the movement of law.

LORD MONCKTON:

Yes.

GLENN:

They look and say, well,

which direction is the country

and the world moving.

LORD MONCKTON:

Yes.

GLENN:

And if the country and the

world is moving into, well,

yeah,

there’s several cities,

several states,

several countries that are

moving in this direction,

well,

then it’s okay.

LORD MONCKTON:

Aha.

There is one obstacle that

they are going to face this

they go down that route and

they know it.

It’s this:

That we now know for certain

by measurement that the effect

of CO2 and all greenhouse gases

on temperature globally is less

than 1/6th of what the UN

says it is.

This was a paper published

just last month by the gallant

professor Richard Lindzen of

MIT who I’m sure you’ve

heard of.

He’s the Alfred piece professor

of planetary and atmospheric

sciences.

GLENN:

We’ve had him on the

program before, yes.

.

.

__

.

.

__SCROLL DOWN FOR PART TWO!

.

.