ClimateGate: When scientists commit criminal fraud, does it count? (Part ONE of TWO)

The

Evidence of

Climate

Fraud

by Marc Sheppard

___November 19th, 2009

American Thinker

AMERICANTHINKER.COM

The Evidence of Climate Fraud

___Part ONE of TWO

__Links are in GREEN

A folder containing documents,

data and, e-mails purportedly

“hacked” from Britain’s Climate

Research Unit (CRU) may be

smoking-gun proof of a

worldwide conspiracy to

exaggerate the existence,

causation,

and threat of global warming.

And the list of apparent

conspirators includes many

of the world’s leading

climate alarmists —

the very scientists on whose

work the entire anthropogenic

global warming theory

is based.

In a Friday interview with

Investigative Magazine’s

TGIF Edition,

CRU director Phillip Jones

confirmed [PDF] that the

incriminating documents,

which have been widely

disseminated online,

are in fact genuine.

Accordingly,

whether indeed the

labor of hackers,

or instead that of a

CRU whistleblower,

the contents of the FOI2009

folder are now public record —

and that’s nothing

short of dynamite.

After all, the names of the

email exchangers represent

a who’s-who of the world’s

leading climate alarmism scientists,

including Stephen Schneider,

Gavin Schmidt,

and James Hansen.

And the e-mails themselves

seemingly betray an organized

apparatus of deception.

In one particularly odious

e-mail dated November 1999,

Jones writes to Michael Mann,

Raymond Bradley,

and Malcolm Hughes:

I’ve just completed Mike’s

Nature trick of adding in

the real temps to each

series for the last 20 years

(ie from 1981 onwards)

amd from 1961 for

Keith’s to hide the decline.

Now,

these are the same Mann,

Bradley,

and Hughes whose MBH98

reconstruction

(aka the “Hockey Stick” graph) —

which deceitfully depicts last

millennium’s global temperatures

as flat prior to a dramatic upturn

last century —

remains the poster-child of

global warming hysteria despite

being thoroughly debunked.

And here we find Jones writing

the three the following year

admitting to using Mann’s

“trick” to “hide” a

temperature decline.

Not surprisingly,

the Keith mentioned is none

other than CRU’s own Keith Briffa,

another Hockey-Team leader,

whose temperature graphs,

derived from tree ring

data from Yamal, Russia,

were cited by the IPCC as

supporting evidence of MBH’s

assertion of unprecedented

20^th-century warming.

But as we reported at the time,

that buttress crumbled last

month when Briffa’s results

were proven to stand no more

reliably than Mann’s.

Ultimately,

neither reconstruction attained

its alarmist imperative goal of

proving today’s global

temperatures unprecedented.

Despite repeated fraudulent

efforts to demonstrate otherwise,

20^th-century highs remain

documented as several degrees

cooler than those of the

Medieval Warming Period of

900-1300 AD.

Bad news for the mankind-

stinks crowd in general;

worse news for those actually

involved in this devious deception.

Both Mann and Briffa had

been challenged for years to

produce their data,

methods,

and source code by Climate

Audit’s Steve McIntyre.

Both ignored the tenets of the

Freedom of Information Act

(FOIA) McIntyre cited and

fought every effort to induce

their coming clean.

And actually not

without good reason —

last month,

CRU was effectively forced to

release the Yamal information,

whereupon an analysis by

McIntyre proved that

Briffa et al. had cherry-picked

and manipulated data,

intentionally omitting records

not friendly to their position.

___35 Inconvenient Truths:

________The Errors In

_______Al Gore’s Movie

______by Lord Monckton

Link to it below(link in GREEN)

___Global Warming Science

___and tons of other stuff

____on this amazing site!

____

2 Responses to “ClimateGate: When scientists commit criminal fraud, does it count? (Part ONE of TWO)”

I believe the Copenhagen Treaty Summit should be cancelled! How in God’s name can this be considered a legal agreement when a Huge Amount of the basis for the Climate Change Data has been found to be Fraudulently Sabotaged and absolutely Inaccurate? This is signing an agreement Document that has no Legal Foundation of Realistic conditions or elements due to inaccurate and Manipulated Data as described and therefore, anything stated on this Copenhagen Treaty Document should be considered Null and Void! Why create a Pandora’s Box, subject to Lawsuits and Misgivings due to total inaccuracy of Scientific measurements? Which now is proving to be the case! This Treaty has no Legal ground to stand on and is and will be a False Document from day one!

Any lawyers want to help out by filing this Copenhagen Treaty be classified as an illegal Treaty!

There are four reasons the UN and IMF, Global Elitist Members Re: Ban Kai Moon ( Who has openly expressed his stong desire for Global Governance ), PM Gordon Brown, Bilderberg Member Henry Kissinger, Senior Bilderberg Member David Rockefeller as well as an unprecedented number of Dictators that run various countries who are members of the United Nations this Copenhagen Treaty that was designed to acquire four goals, the least of them being climate improvment or protection as Lord Moncton has stated!
(1.) To de-industrialize Sovereign Countries ( No Jobs keep you dependant on State ) ( 2.) Take your money and assets – Hence, Fraudulent Carbon Emmissions and Carbon Gases for Carbon Credits and Carbon Taxes! (3.) Take away your property (4.) Take away your Sovereignty and Freedom!

Check out what Government is doing behind your back at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

http://www.gopetition.com/online/32485.html ( For Canadians who do not wish to lose their Sovereignty should PM Stephen Harper sign the Copenhagen Treaty )

Loading...

Btok - December 1, 2009 at 5:28 am | Reply

Reply
Well said Btok,
I agree with you.

Thank You for the great links and
Thank You for reading 22MOON.

Rash

Loading...

rashmanly - December 1, 2009 at 6:50 am | Reply

Reply

22MOON.COM
You can see the whole Earth from the Moon!