“Affairs of the heart (affaires de cœur) the most dangerous game.” Rash Manly
.
.
.
Love’s bite
is deeper,
Tiger
By Agnes Poirier
.
____December 7th, 2009
GUARDIAN.CO.UK
___Links are in GREEN
.
.
A curious saga unfolded
across the media last week.
Hour by hour we were fed reports
on the Tiger Woods car crash,
his refusal to meet police,
and speculation about
The best-paid sports star
in the world barricaded himself
at home and apologised for his
“transgressions” and “failings”.
.
.
But this did not stop the alleged
“love cheat” being lectured about
Truth with a capital T.
Indeed,
so many words ring false in this
modern chronicle of love:
hero,
zero,
recompense –
as well as truth.
If this saga proves one thing,
it is not Woods’s “malice”,
but that love is threatened by
the world’s two leading ideologies:
libertarianism and liberalism.
These two 21st-century diseases
concur to make us believe that love
is a risk not worth taking:
as if we could have,
on one hand,
a safe conjugality;
and on the other,
sexual arrangements that will
spare us the dangers of passion.
Both are illusions.
In a remarkable book that has just
come out called Eloge de l’Amour
(Eulogy of Love),
the French philosopher Alain Badiou
ponders on the nature of love,
and how Judaism,
Christianity,
philosophy,
politics and art have in turn
treated and considered this
universal event:
the bursting on to the stage
of our lives of this
most unruly agent.
.
.
Badiou was struck by an
advertising campaign last year
for Meetic,
a European dating website.
Its slogans:
“Get Love without the hazards!”;
“You can love
without falling in love”;
and
“You can love without suffering!”
In other words,
Meetic offers the public 100%
Guaranteed Risk Free Love.
This prompted Badiou to comment:
“Love without the fall,
love without the risks,
is just another piece of propaganda,
just like the presumed security
of arranged marriages or,
for that matter,
the American invention
of a zero-casualty war.
Love is what gives our life
intensity and meaning,
thus full of risks,
in my opinion worth taking.”
.
.
For the philosopher,
the other threat to love
today is the liberal dogma:
one that denies love its
importance by making it
another extension of hedonism
and consumerism.
As Rimbaud said,
“Love must be reinvented” –
against the dictatorship of
security and comfort.
Placing himself between the
extremes represented by
Schopenhauer‘s pessimism and
Kierkegaard‘s absolute,
Badiou starts from Plato –
for whom love is an
elan towards idealism –
and distances himself
from French moralists,
who traditionally view love
as the ornament to desire
and sexual jealousy.
For him,
love is not truth,
but a construction of the truth
with someone who is not
identical but different.
It is also a pig-headed attempt
to make an event last in time.
“Obstinacy is a
strong element of love.”
Artists have always preferred
the figure of love as an
all-consuming encounter,
revolutionary perhaps,
but doomed from the start,
as in André Breton’s Nadja.
.
.
In the arts,
obstinate love hasn’t
much inspired artists.
Except one perhaps:
in Samuel Beckett,
Badiou sees the real
champion of love.
For Badiou,
Beckett’s Happy Days is far more
romantic than Tristan and Isolde.
“Think of this old couple who
have pigheadly loved each other:
magnificent!”
Badiou refutes the romantic notion
of fusion and the dissolution of
oneself in the other’s gaze.
He insists that love is built
on the alterity between lovers,
and says –
in opposition to religious thinkers –
that children are steps along the way,
not love’s final destination.
For all these reasons,
Badiou links love to
revolution and resistance:
a revolution because it implies
contradictions and violence;
and a resistance to today’s
tyranny of puritanical lecturing,
hypocritical public confession,
naming and shaming,
and the ultimate fantasy –
the infallible hero.
.
.
.
.
_Agnès Poirier
.
.
.
.
.
.
[…] ONE of TWO) Put a Tiger in your Skank! (Part TWO of TWO) . . . Tiger’s Tawdry Tale “Affairs of the heart (affaires de cœur) the most dangerous game.” Rash Manly Tiger “Hot Putter” Woods […]
Catch a Tiger Woods by his Tale (Part ONE of TWO) « 22MOON.COM - January 3, 2010 at 7:38 am |