Meet my dates Minnie Fingers and Rosy Palms!
.
MEDICAL research
usually sees us taking
a small step forward
in understanding
diseases,
Dr. Keith reports for
The U.K. Sun
January 29th.
But there’s a danger that a
new study linking masturbation
and prostate cancer might set
us back 100 years or so.
Because it suggests that
“self-pleasure” may be
bad for men.
So maybe those old-fashioned
fears that solo sex may cause
epilepsy, impotence,
hairy hands,
stunted growth and
blindness were
right all along.
.
Even now,
when blokes are at their most tribal,
they have a nagging fear their
favourite pastime may be unhealthy.
Hence the terrace chant
“The referee’s a w****r”,
typically prompted by doubts
about the official’s eyesight.
So what’s in this new research?
A Nottingham team looked at
sexual activity and the risk
of prostate cancer.
And they found a link between frequent
sex and masturbation in younger men
and increased risk of developing
the Big Prostate C.
.
Their theory is that a man’s sex drive
is dictated by his hormone levels.
And hormones play a key
role in prostate cancer, too.
So the higher your testosterone,
they suggest,
the more time you spend pleasuring
yourself but the less likely you are
to beat off prostate cancer.
Blimey.
Does that mean all men should
immediately be issued with
a male chastity belt?
Of course not.
Because, as ever,
it’s pretty easy to pick
holes in the research.
.
For starters,
it looked only at prostate cancer
developing before the age of 60 —
but that’s not a typical sample,
given that most cases are
diagnosed after that age.
Also, the study asked men to record
information about their sexual activity,
often from many years previously.
But you have to ask how accurate
the average bloke is likely to be when
reminiscing about sexual performance.
And the research
found only a “link”.
That doesn’t prove
cause and effect.
After all,
there’s a link between
wearing red shirts —
think Man Utd,
Liverpool and Arsenal —
and being near the top
of the Premier League.
Obviously,
the one doesn’t
cause the other.
Even if the researchers’
hormone theory is correct,
it doesn’t mean masturbating
less will help.
.
Because they reckon
“frequent masturbation” is the
result of “high” hormone levels,
which leads to the cancer risk —
not the cause.
And remember,
it’s just a theory —
there are loads more
where that came from.
Still worried?
Bear in mind that in the
great scheme of things,
a single medical research paper
almost never changes anything.
As the boffins themselves admit,
more research is necessary before
you can start drawing conclusions.
And I know of at least two studies
in the past five years which have
suggested the exact opposite to the
conclusions of the Nottingham group.
Besides,
you can bet the whole prostate
cancer story is a lot more complicated
than just hormones and an intimate
night with your hand —
other factors known to affect
the risk include genetics, race,
diet and job.
Keep in mind the bigger picture,
too.
There may, of course,
be benefits to masturbation.
And I don’t just mean the obvious.
After all,
there has been research to show
that the more orgasms a man has,
the fewer heart problems he is likely
to suffer and the longer he
is likely to live.
So I reckon this “hot news” needs
some cold water pouring over it —
unlike the average red-blooded male.
.
.
.
MEDICAL research
usually sees us taking
a small step forward
in understanding
diseases,
Dr. Keith reports for
The U.K. Sun
January 29th.
But there’s a danger that a
new study linking masturbation
and prostate cancer might set
us back 100 years or so.
Because it suggests that
“self-pleasure” may be
bad for men.
So maybe those old-fashioned
fears that solo sex may cause
epilepsy, impotence,
hairy hands,
stunted growth and
blindness were
right all along.
.
Even now,
when blokes are at their most tribal,
they have a nagging fear their
favourite pastime may be unhealthy.
Hence the terrace chant
“The referee’s a w****r”,
typically prompted by doubts
about the official’s eyesight.
So what’s in this new research?
A Nottingham team looked at
sexual activity and the risk
of prostate cancer.
And they found a link between frequent
sex and masturbation in younger men
and increased risk of developing
the Big Prostate C.
.
Their theory is that a man’s sex drive
is dictated by his hormone levels.
And hormones play a key
role in prostate cancer, too.
So the higher your testosterone,
they suggest,
the more time you spend pleasuring
yourself but the less likely you are
to beat off prostate cancer.
Blimey.
Does that mean all men should
immediately be issued with
a male chastity belt?
Of course not.
Because, as ever,
it’s pretty easy to pick
holes in the research.
.
For starters,
it looked only at prostate cancer
developing before the age of 60 —
but that’s not a typical sample,
given that most cases are
diagnosed after that age.
Also, the study asked men to record
information about their sexual activity,
often from many years previously.
But you have to ask how accurate
the average bloke is likely to be when
reminiscing about sexual performance.
And the research
found only a “link”.
That doesn’t prove
cause and effect.
After all,
there’s a link between
wearing red shirts —
think Man Utd,
Liverpool and Arsenal —
and being near the top
of the Premier League.
Obviously,
the one doesn’t
cause the other.
Even if the researchers’
hormone theory is correct,
it doesn’t mean masturbating
less will help.
.
Because they reckon
“frequent masturbation” is the
result of “high” hormone levels,
which leads to the cancer risk —
not the cause.
And remember,
Still worried?
Bear in mind that in the
great scheme of things,
a single medical research paper
almost never changes anything.
As the boffins themselves admit,
more research is necessary before
you can start drawing conclusions.
And I know of at least two studies
in the past five years which have
suggested the exact opposite to the
conclusions of the Nottingham group.
Besides,
you can bet the whole prostate
cancer story is a lot more complicated
than just hormones and an intimate
night with your hand —
other factors known to affect
the risk include genetics, race,
diet and job.
Keep in mind the bigger picture,
too.
There may, of course,
be benefits to masturbation.
And I don’t just mean the obvious.
After all,
there has been research to show
that the more orgasms a man has,
the fewer heart problems he is likely
to suffer and the longer he
is likely to live.
So I reckon this “hot news” needs
some cold water pouring over it —
unlike the average red-blooded male.
.
.
Interesting study.
Agnis Franklin - October 17, 2009 at 8:50 am |