22MOON.COM
You can see the whole Earth from the Moon!

Posts Tagged ‘1400 CHILDREN GROOMED – DRUGGED AND RAPED BY MULTICULTURALISM – James Delingpole – BreitBart.com

Loud Left won’t mention Islamic misogyny and rape

June 9, 2015

REPORT: ISIS LEADER ENCOURAGES PEDOPHILIA
Tells jihadists to “enjoy young boys in the absence of women”

Why is The Left blind to Islamic misogyny and rape?

February 5, 2015

Why are nearly all European and American Leftists/socialists/”progressives” (as well as most feminists) utterly silent on Islamic misogyny and rape?

The answer to that is brutally simple.

It’s simply because most Muslims have brown and black skin. Thus the Left’s racist and theory-driven anti-racism trumps both feminism and justice itself.

All this explains what happened in the UK town of Rotherham.

Rotherham is a town in the north of England in which hundreds — perhaps thousands — of young girls were not only the victims of Muslim sexual-grooming gangs; but also victims of Rotherham’s “anti-racism policies”. (See this article for details on the Rotherham case: ‘Muslim sex gangs and the young victims of Rotherham Council’s anti-racism policies’.)

Leftist anti-racism (or the anti-racism policies and actions of councilors, the police, social workers, politicians, etc.) trumped the abuse of hundreds of white girls and even erased any prior commitment to feminist principles.

When child sex abuse isn’t news

September 5, 2014

In America, the same TV networks over the last dozen years have filed hundreds of noise-making stories slamming decades-old allegations of child abuse in the Catholic Church — suddenly they can’t find this story with two hands. There’s been nothing on ABC, CBS, NBC or PBS. A Nexis search can’t even find any transcripts mentioning the story on CNN or MSNBC, and just one on Fox News. USA Today hasn’t found it, and The Washington Post only placed a story online, not in the paper.

Political Correctness protecting child rape gangs

August 31, 2014

It’s the crime no one wants to take responsibility for. The same statements are trotted out time after time. “Missed opportunities” and “lessons have been learned” are the stock phrases we’ve grown tired of hearing from council officers and police chiefs. But the horror stories keep coming. Children being trafficked from one town to the next, raped in dingy flats then beaten, held at gun point, doused in petrol and threatened to be set alight if they so much as breathe a word. This is not happening in some war-torn Eastern Bloc country. It’s happening here in Britain and all we’re seeing is a lot of hand wringing from unsackable, unaccountable and unapologetic public servants.

1400 children groomed, drugged and raped by Political Correctness

August 27, 2014

When is the sexual abuse of children culturally, socially and politically acceptable?
A: When it’s committed with industrial efficiency by organised gangs of mainly Pakistani men in English Northern towns like Burnley, Oldham and Rotherham, of course.
But obviously you’re not allowed to admit this or you might sound racist. That’s why, for example, in today’s BBC report into the fact that at least 1400 children were subjected to “appalling” sexual abuse in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, you have to wade 20 paragraphs in before finally you discover the ethnic identity of the perpetrators.
And even then, the embarrassing fact slips out only with the most blushing mealy-mouthedness:
By far the majority of perpetrators of abuse were described as “Asian” by victims.
Well hang on, a second. What this phrase seems to be hinting at is the possibility that the men involved weren’t “Asian” (note to US readers: Asian is UK PC-speak for Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, not orientals) but that the victims mistakenly took them to be so. Is that actually the case or not?
Let’s have a look at the names of the Rotherham men found guilty by Sheffield Crown Court in 2010 of raping or sexually abusing girls as young as 12 shall we. Maybe that’ll help.
Zafran Ramzan
Razwan Razaq
Umar Razaq
Adil Hussain
Mohsin Khan
Nope. Absolutely no clues there