22MOON.COM
You can see the whole Earth from the Moon!

Obama more concerned with the war against ObamaCare foes and Fox News than terrorists

.

.

barack-obama-is-on-fire

.

_ObamaHalo3.jpgObamaHalo3.jpgObamaHalo3.jpg

3397416370_ab47a729b0michelle_obama_haloObamaHalo11

ObamaHalo13.jpgobamamessiah01aaa_obama_halo2obama_haloobama1-1

.

ObamaHalo12.jpgObamaHalo17.jpgObamaAscending.jpg

.

.

.

Dick Cheney:

Barack Obama

‘trying to

pretend’



By Mike Allen


_____December 30th, 2009


POLITICO.COM

Barack Obama ‘trying to pretend’


Former Vice President

Dick Cheney accused

President Barack Obama

on Tuesday of

“trying to pretend

we are not at war”

with terrorists,

pointing to the White

House response to the

attempted sky bombing

as reflecting a pattern

that includes banishing

the term “war on terror”

and attempting to close

the Guantanamo Bay

detention center.


“[W]e are at war and when

President Obama pretends we aren’t,

it makes us less safe,”

Cheney said in a statement

to POLITICO.


“Why doesn’t he want

to admit we’re at war?


It doesn’t fit with the view

of the world he brought with

him to the Oval Office.


It doesn’t fit with what seems to

be the goal of his presidency —

social transformation —

the restructuring of

American society.”

.

.

Cheney was joining a chorus of

Republicans who have criticized

Obama following

the Christmas Day attack,

in which a Nigerian suspect is

accused of trying to blow up

a loaded airliner with a bomb

stitched into his underwear.


A senior Democrat said in response:

“It’s telling that in attacking the

president and the administration,

that Vice President Cheney did

not condemn the attack against

our nation on Christmas Day.”


Foreshadowing the party’s

strategy for next year’s midterm

congressional elections,

GOP officeholders have eschewed

the customary partisan restraint

following a terrorist incident

and baldly portrayed Democrats

as weak on security.

.

2739502795_3fdb5a35d1

.


Rep. Peter King of New York,

ranking Republican on the House

Homeland Security Committee

and a member of the Intelligence

Committee,

said Tuesday on NBC’s “Today” show:

“I think that the administration

has made a mistake by treating

this terrorist as a common criminal,

by putting him into the criminal-justice

system.

I wish they had put him into

a military tribunal so we could

get as much intelligence and

information out of him as we could.”

.

______

.

Here is Cheney’s

full statement:


“As I’ve watched the events

of the last few days it is clear

once again that President Obama

is trying to pretend

we are not at war.


He seems to think if he has

a low-key response to an attempt

to blow up an airliner and kill

hundreds of people,

we won’t be at war.


He seems to think if he gives

terrorists the rights of Americans,

lets them lawyer up and reads

them their Miranda rights,

we won’t be at war.


He seems to think if we bring

the mastermind of Sept. 11 to

New York,

give him a lawyer and

trial in civilian court,

we won’t be at war.


“He seems to think if he closes

Guantanamo and releases the

hard-core Al Qaeda-trained

terrorists still there,

we won’t be at war.


He seems to think if he

gets rid of the words,

‘war on terror,’

we won’t be at war.

.

_____

.

But we are at war

and when President Obama

pretends we aren’t,

it makes us less safe.


Why doesn’t he want to

admit we’re at war?


It doesn’t fit with the view

of the world he brought with

him to the Oval Office.


It doesn’t fit with what seems

to be the goal of his presidency —

social transformation —

the restructuring of

American society.


President Obama’s first object

and his highest responsibility

must be to defend us against an

enemy that knows we are at war.”


Although Cheney and other

Republicans have accused Obama

of a muted response to the attack,

President George W. Bush was

quieter for much longer about

the attack by shoe bomber

Richard Reid in December 2001.


Obama went before

cameras on Monday,

the third day after the

fizzled bomb attempt.


It was six days after Reid’s

attempted attack that Bush

finally discussed the incident,

saying as part of a response

to a question at his ranch

in Crawford, Texas:

“[W]e’ve got to be aware that

there are still enemies to

the country.

And our government is

responding accordingly.”

.

.

The day before,

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

had refused substantive comment,

saying:

“That’s a matter that’s in the hands

of the law enforcement people.”


Earlier, White House press

secretary Scott McClellan had

said officials were

“continuing to monitor events.”


Also,

Democratic officials maintain

that Obama is, in fact,

comfortable with the notion that

the U.S. is at war with terrorists.


Near the start of his inaugural address,

he said:

“Our nation is at war against

a far-reaching network of

violence and hatred.”


And John O. Brennan,

assistant to the president for

homeland security and counterterrorism,

declared in an August speech to the

Center for Strategic and International

Studies:

“[A]s the president has made clear,

we are at war with Al Qaeda,

which attacked us on Sept. 11

and killed 3,000 people.


We are at war with its violent

extremist allies who seek to carry

on Al Qaeda’s murderous agenda.


These are the terrorists

we will destroy;

these are the extremists

we will defeat.”


The senior Democrat said:

“There are numerous other such

public statements that explicitly

state we are at war.


The difference from the last

administration is that we are at

war with that which is tangible —

Al Qaeda,

violent extremists,

and terrorists —

rather than at war with a tactic,

‘terrorism’.”


As indicative of what they

contend is Obama’s world view,

conservatives passed around the

recording of a statement Obama

made on Nov. 21, 2007, while

taking calls on New Hampshire

Public Radio:

“I truly believe that the

day I’m inaugurated,

that not only does the country

look at itself differently,

but the world looks at

America differently.


If I’m reaching out

to the Muslim world,

they understand that

I’ve lived in a Muslim

country and I may be

a Christian,

but I also can understand

their point of view. …


“The world will have

confidence that I am

listening to them,

and that our future

and our security is tied

up with our ability to

work with other countries

in the world.


That will ultimately

make us safer.


And that’s something

that this administration

has failed to understand.”

.

.

.

2880574569_5267d27153

hitlerchamberlain_1

2566173508_d9492c3fd3-4rVHptydvyh_obama-theone-1obamahalo7

.

.

2 Responses to “Obama more concerned with the war against ObamaCare foes and Fox News than terrorists”

  1. To What Are You Loyal?
    by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
    December 31, 2009

    With the crafting of the Hitler-like “IMAB”
    conditionality in the Senate health-care bill,
    President Barack Obama’s faction within the
    Democratic Party has gone over,
    not only, to the side of the enemies of our
    Federal Constitution’s most fundamental principle, but,
    by lending aid to such implicitly treasonous action,
    has given support to that which is fairly described
    as the principle of Satanic evil expressed in the usurpatious,
    and,
    frankly pro-satanic policies of Britain’s former
    Prime Minister Tony Blair who has led in reviving
    Adolf Hitler’s war-time health-care policies,
    with the active prompting of him by the leading
    figures of the present British royal house.

    Under these conditions,
    when our republic is under a presently existential
    threat to its continued moral,
    and also its physical existence as a free republic,
    our patriots must make a principled break
    with the presently incumbent British monarchy.

    Patriotic Democrats,
    in or out of the Federal Congress,
    will prove themselves patriots by breaking themselves
    free of the control recently exerted by that corrupted
    administration and its leading accomplices within
    the Presidency and the Congress.

    They,
    for the very soul’s sake,
    must join with other patriots in summarily
    ridding this nation of that evil which is represented by
    those who have acted to support the frankly
    Satanic evil which the President has come to
    represent through policies of practice such as the present,
    implicitly pro-Satanic,
    version of the draft health-care legislation
    introduced under the present Senate leader.

    By his actions in this matter,
    especially those offenses represented by his
    so-called “health-care reforms,”
    this President and those elements of his
    Administration and Party which have crafted the hideous,
    Hitler-like policies represented by the content of the
    present Senate draft of that bill,
    have made themselves complicit,
    whether wittingly or not,
    with a policy which is tantamount to that of the
    Nuremberg crimes traced to Hitler’s health-care
    measures introduced as those “Nazi Tiergarten 4”
    health-care policy under the war-time Nazi law
    which led to the great genocide for which leading
    physicians and others were condemned to death
    in the so-called “Nuremberg” proceedings.

    We must join with those nations of the world
    which had led in defeating the evil scheme which
    the present British imperial monarchy had brought
    to the recent Copenhagen “summit.”

    We must align ourselves with those nations
    which share the principle which was defended
    against the evil,
    long associated with her consort,
    the Duke of Edinburgh,
    the which Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,
    had assigned to that Copenhagen “summit,”

    the Duke’s intention to reduce a world population
    of a currently estimated 6.7 billions living human souls,
    to two or less, that at a rapid rate.

    We would hope that our sane and honorable “cousins”
    within the population of the United Kingdom would
    lend support to what should be, morally,
    our common cause against the monstrously great evil
    which the recent Senate action in support of
    President Obama’s and former Prime Minister
    Tony Blair’s evil scheme represents as a currently immediate, implicitly pro-Satanic,
    Hitler-like, threat to all humanity.

    http://www.larouchepac.com

  2. THAT PIECE OF MUSSEM / COMMIE
    ANTI WHITE HAYEING PIECE OF SHIT OBAMA.

    TAKE THAT FUCKING NIGGER OUT
    IN FRONT OF THE WHITE HOUSE /
    THEN HANG THR COMMIE BASTARD.

    O YA PUT IT ON TV/ ILL SAT AND WATCH
    THE PIECE OF SHIT COMMIE ASS SUCKER
    TAKE HIS LAST BREATH.

    HANG ALL DEMACRAT COMMIE/ REED/
    NANCY DA COMMIE / BARABA BOXER
    THE FAG LOVER COMMIE/
    DIAN FINESTIN DA JUE COMMIE.

    ALL THOSE COMMIE
    ASSHOL:ERS CAN GO TO HELL.

    SAVE AMERICA KILL A COMMIE


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: