ClimateGate: Global Warming/Climate Change zealots bully non-worshippers into submission! (Part TWO OF TWO)
.
Climategate’s
Bullyboy
Scientists
By Christopher Chantrill
____December 8th, 2009
American Thinker
AMERICANTHINKER.COM
____PART TWO OF TWO
____LINKS ARE IN GREEN
It’s a symbiotic relationship.
Scientists want to do important work,
and politicians want the fruits of
science when it gives
them more power.
Just as religious leaders have often
turned to politicians and kings
when the going gets rough,
so scientists have turned to
government for help.
After all,
that’s where the money is.
But just as an establishment
ruled by religion is a bad thing,
so is an establishment ruled
by science.
Today,
if Thomas Jefferson were alive,
he’d probably be calling for a
separation of science and state,
and in The New York Times
science section,
to boot.
.

.
Physics offered the politicians
bombs of unimaginable power,
and it offered the scientists
budgets of unimaginable size.
It’s a pity the bombs are so
powerful that they can’t be used.
And it’s a pity that science-based
war is now so expensive that the
low-rent political actors have
turned to terrorism,
which is warfare on the cheap.
Macroeconomics offered the politicians
the hope of manipulating the economy
to reward their supporters
without tears.
It offered economists a
seat in the citadel of power.
Yet under the reign of the
macroeconomic expertise,
the value of money has fallen
faster than in the bad old days
when kings and princes managed
to debase the coinage without
the help of scientists.
.
.
There is nothing
mysterious about this.
The world is full of good ideas:
scientific ideas,
political ideas,
business ideas.
But what about good
ideas that actually work?
Not so many.
People with merely “good ideas”
tend to sell them to the political
world rather than the business world.
Conservative politicians have always
been cautious about expertise.
Edmund Burke
railed against economists,
sophisters,
and calculators.
Lord Salisbury,
Conservative Prime Minister
of Britain,
wrote in a letter to a friend
in 1877:
No lesson seems to be sodeeply inculcated by the experienceof life as that you should never
If you believe doctors,nothing is wholesome:if you believe the theologians,nothing is innocent:if you believe the soldiers,nothing is safe.
They all require their strongwine diluted by a very largeadmixture of insipidcommon sense.
If you believe the climate scientists,
nothing is as warm as today.
.
.

.
So James Hansen,
Michael “The Bruiser” Mann,
and Phil Jones are nothing new.
What is new is the cruel way
in which Climategate is humiliating
the Manns and the Joneses.
In The Structure
of Scientific Revolutions,
Thomas Kuhn asserts that a
scientific field truly becomes a
“science” when its practitioners
can “take the foundations of
their field for granted”
and report their results in articles
addressed to and understandable
only by other specialists.
When a man like Steve McIntyre
can come in from another field
and rock the foundations of
hockey-stick-ology with his critique,
then he is telling the Manns and
the Joneses that they don’t have
a “science.”
All they have is a religion.
…Not that there’s
anything wrong with that.
.
.
.
.
.

.
___35 Inconvenient Truths:
________The Errors In
_______Al Gore’s Movie
______by Lord Monckton
Link to it below(link in GREEN)
___and tons of other stuff
____on this amazing site!
.
____

.

.
__Copenhagen links in GREEN
.

.

.

Global Warming-IS- Human / Industrial Waste!
The best indisputable SCIENCE example
that should be the #1 item on the Copenhagen Agenda
would be the toxic waste dump,
the size of Texas,
900 miles off of the United States and Canadian West Coast.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GreatPacificGarbagePatch
That is a Big SCIENCE problem with no dedicated
U.S SCIENCE and INNOVATION DEPARTMENT
to address the issue.
The U.S (or Canada) has not even sent out a
SCIENCE research vessel to evaluate this ecological disaster;
neither country wants to take the responsibility for the industrial/human pollution or even acknowledge its existence.
No Profit-No Action!-No SCIENCE!
Will the World Trade Organization and the
New Industrial World Order address the issue?
Where is their World SCIENCE Department?
Can the problem be solved with SCIENCE?
Probably so,
Americans are very ingenious primarily
because we were raised with the compliments
of Freedom and Democracy and are
free thinking individuals.
We could probably figure a way
to clean up the mess and possibly
make a profit doing so.
We can do nothing until we have a
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE that is free to address
SCIENCE and to develop the advancement of SCIENCE.
(Yes, for the sake of humanity;
SCIENCE FIRST-PANDERING SECOND.)
Lawrence Baker - December 13, 2009 at 5:59 pm |