Japan scientists expose ClimateGate! (Part THREE of FOUR)
..
.


.

.

Japan’s
boffins:
Global
Warming
isn’t
man-made
By Andrew Orlowski
(Translation by
Charles Eicher)
February 25th, 2009
THEREGISTER.CO.UK
The Register (link)
_Part THREE of FOUR
.

.
Japan’s
boffins:
Global
Warming
isn’t
man-made
By Andrew Orlowski
(Translation by
Charles Eicher)
February 25th, 2009
THEREGISTER.CO.UK
The Register (link)
_Part THREE of FOUR
.
.
Predicting the future
Numerical simulation by forecast models are generally classified
as theoretical models and
empirical models.
The former follows universal laws
and carries out predictive
calculations,
the latter makes models that are
thought to be realistic from data
of phenomenon.
These two methods cannot
be strictly differentiated,
generally experiential methods
gradually become theoretical
methods,
finally becoming the
generally accepted dogma.
Celestial mechanics originated
in astrological prediction of
solar and lunar eclipses,
calendars were
experiential predictions;
mechanistic theory evolved
when we reached an era of
accurate computation.
.
.
Consequently,
the predictability of celestial
mechanics became extremely
high and practical estimates
gave way to proof.
Similarly,
modern Global Climate Models
still largely dependent on
empirical models.
Fundamental principles,
therefore must resolve very
complex physical/chemical/
biological processes
and phenomenon.
That is why many artificial
optimization operations
(parameterization tuning)
are needed,
or we will not be able to
reproduce the phenomenon.
Because of this,
besides mathematical accuracy,
the people who construct
models’ choice of processes and
optimum operating guidelines
will have large scale effects
on the calculated results.
.
.
1.
Scientific Understanding
and Uncertainty
.
When constructing models,
if our scientific understanding
is poor,
we are not able to
capture the model.
But we should pay attention to
the importance of the naturally
occurring processes when our
scientific understanding is
not yet clearly decided.
In the IPCC’s 4th
Evaluation Report,
a few potentially major
processes were discussed;
but [since] scientific
understanding was
too low to decide,
the evaluation of
these was omitted.
In order to scientifically
understand the uncertainty
of accurate estimates according
to the potential importance
of these processes,
“the cause of lack of scientific
understanding and uncertainty”
must be assessed.
.
__
.
Finally,
uncertainty estimates
should be included.
For example,
the effect of variances in
cosmic ray activity on clouds,
caused by sunspot activity,
solar flares accompanied by
energetic protons striking
the upper atmosphere and
generating NOx
and ozone effects [*], etc.,
are not sufficiently understood
and incorporated
into the models.
Also,
there are great uncertainties
in reproducing historical TSI
(Total Solar Irradiance),
TSI fluctuation and spectral
change related climate sensitivity
estimates are inadequate.
.
.
.
___35 Inconvenient Truths:
__________Lord Monckton Al Gore
________
__
.
Related links in GREEN
.
.
ClimateGate link in GREEN
.
.
.
.
[…] ClimateGate! (Part ONE of FOUR) Japan scientists expose ClimateGate! (Part TWO ofr FOUR) Japan scientists expose ClimateGate! (Part THREE of FOUR) Japan scientists expose ClimateGate! (Part FOUR […]
ClimateGate: When scientists commit criminal fraud, does it still count? (Part ONE of TWO) « 22MOON.COM - November 30, 2009 at 10:02 pm |